Advertisements


Go Back   Four Thirds User discussion forum > Equipment > Olympus E-System Four Thirds DSLRs plus Pen and OM-D Micro Four Thirds compact system cameras

Olympus E-System Four Thirds DSLRs plus Pen and OM-D Micro Four Thirds compact system cameras Find model-specific discussion boards for all the Olympus E-System models here.

View Poll Results: Which of these possible solutions for users of Four Thirds lenses appeals the most?
Conventional DSLR - an update to an existing model like the E-5. 22 36.07%
A Four Thirds mount camera body with an electronic viewfinder. 6 9.84%
A Sony NEX-style smart adapter providing Phase Detect AF for Micro Four Thirds bodies. 8 13.11%
A Micro Four Thirds body with a built-in solution for optimal FT lens AF using adapter. 22 36.07%
None of the above. 3 4.92%
Voters: 61. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 25th July 2013
Ian's Avatar
Ian Ian is offline
admin
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Hemel Hempstead UK
Posts: 7,709
Blog Entries: 13
Thanks: 144
Thanked 760 Times in 466 Posts
Likes: 93
Liked 123 Times in 61 Posts
Four Thirds lens compatibility - what's your preference?

As we all know, although it is perfectly feasible to use Four Thirds lenses via an MMF adapter on a Micro Four Thirds camera, most Four Thirds lenses are designed to autofocus with phase-detection focus sensors that are central to contemporary DSLR cameras. This means autofocus is not ideal when Four Thirds lenses are used with Micro Four Thirds cameras, which employ contrast detection to gauge focus automatically.

Olympus has publicly stated that before the end of this year a solution for Four Thirds lens users will be revealed. Apart from that there are no firm details, but several realistic possibilities.

So this is a poll to find out which possible solution you prefer. You can only select one choice.

Thanks,

Ian
__________________
Founder/editor
Four Thirds User (http://fourthirds-user.com)
Digital Photography Now (http://dpnow.com)
Olympus UK E-System User Group (http://e-group.uk.net)
Olympus camera, lens, and accessory hire (http://e-group.uk.net/hire)
Twitter: www.twitter.com/ian_burley
Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/dpnow/
Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/ianburley/
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 25th July 2013
T-Lama's Avatar
T-Lama T-Lama is offline
Doomsayer of the 4/3 sys.
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Prague, Czech Rep.
Posts: 544
Thanks: 46
Thanked 59 Times in 45 Posts
Likes: 13
Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Re: Four Thirds lens compatibility - what's your preference?

I would choose DSLR with optional built-in EVF, that can use both 4/3s and m4/3s lenses. It can be done, but the contruction would be quite complex and thus expensive. If I can't have that, I am going for a (large) m4/3 body with good ergonomy and C-AF at least on E-1 level, or even better with full scene tracking.
__________________
Regards, Pavel.

E-1(x2) | ZD 14-45 | ZD 14-54 | ZD 40-150 Mk.1 | ZD 70-300 | FL-50 | Velbon Sherpa 750R
M42(Pancolar 50/1.8, Pentacon 200/4)+ M42->4/3 reduction
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 25th July 2013
Sir Otto's Avatar
Sir Otto Sir Otto is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Wensleydale
Posts: 129
Thanks: 8
Thanked 19 Times in 11 Posts
Likes: 3
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Four Thirds lens compatibility - what's your preference?

Having fairly recently bought into MFT (via OM-D) I chose option 3. I have the Olympus 12-60 and 50-200 SWD lenses which I'd like to use with the OM-D but the focus performance is less than ideal, certainly compared to my E-620. An adaptor which improves that functionality on my OM-D would be of much more interest to me than a new MFT body. Something like an MMF-4 with PDAF built in.
__________________
Regards
Richard
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 25th July 2013
Bikie John Bikie John is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Wessex
Posts: 33
Thanks: 1
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Four Thirds lens compatibility - what's your preference?

It's hard to pick a good answer here, because as always the devil is in the detail. having both "big" and micro-4/3rds bodies I'm not too fused about which format it is. A good optical viewfinder is nice but the electronic ones are quite good (E-M5) and still improving (E-P5 and VF-4 allegedly) and offer extra functionality.

I think what I'm after is a way to use those wonderful big fast 4/3rds lenses without compromising key aspects of their function - specifically image quality, speed (in light-gathering terms - so don't throw any of the light away in a focussing subsystem), weatherproofing - and hopefully improved AF performance. It would be nice if it could be crammed into an adapter for existing m43 bodies but I suspect that is a tall order.

Because of where we are now you will never please everybody!

Ciao ... John
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 25th July 2013
DNC13 DNC13 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Doncaster
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Four Thirds lens compatibility - what's your preference?

Personally having no m4/3 I would like a new body similar to the E-5 as I think the balance with lens such as 90-250 will be better.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 25th July 2013
Dan in NC's Avatar
Dan in NC Dan in NC is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Cary, North Carolina
Posts: 89
Thanks: 21
Thanked 11 Times in 7 Posts
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Four Thirds lens compatibility - what's your preference?

I would like to see a DSLR with an optical mirror for the high end (E-3/E-5 size is okay with me), and a 43 mirrorless camera that is about the size of a E-5XX for the lower end. I think that these two options for 43 users would be reasonable, given that there have been so many variations on the Pen line.
__________________
Dan Lang
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dan in NC For This Useful Post:
Patrick (25th July 2013), West Arm Rider (25th July 2013)
  #7  
Old 25th July 2013
John Perriment's Avatar
John Perriment John Perriment is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,099
Blog Entries: 30
Thanks: 398
Thanked 443 Times in 354 Posts
Likes: 70
Liked 115 Times in 83 Posts
Re: Four Thirds lens compatibility - what's your preference?

The NEX style adaptor would be the best solution for me, having already got the E-M5 and being on a budget. However, I voted for option four, "A Micro Four Thirds body with a built-in solution for optimal FT lens AF using adapter" because I feel this is the best solution for the system in the long run and would be a very strong selling point for future cameras. Maybe Olympus could eventually do both, so that existing MFT cameras benefit from
compatability of 4/3 lenses too. Now THAT would be the best solution!
__________________
View my ebook, The Light Fantastic, at: http://store.blurb.co.uk/ebooks/3026...ight-fantastic

John
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to John Perriment For This Useful Post:
Blu-by-u (23rd August 2013), hschnee (25th July 2013)
  #8  
Old 26th July 2013
benvendetta benvendetta is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: south Wales
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Four Thirds lens compatibility - what's your preference?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DNC13 View Post
Personally having no m4/3 I would like a new body similar to the E-5 as I think the balance with lens such as 90-250 will be better.
I think that the balance would be better with an E-7(?), but how many people have these SHG beasts?
I can't see it happening.
__________________
Dave
Welsh Photographic Federation Judge
Olympus UKPSG Member
Chairman Cwmbran Photographic Society
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 26th July 2013
benvendetta benvendetta is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: south Wales
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Four Thirds lens compatibility - what's your preference?

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Perriment View Post
The NEX style adaptor would be the best solution for me, having already got the E-M5 and being on a budget. However, I voted for option four, "A Micro Four Thirds body with a built-in solution for optimal FT lens AF using adapter" because I feel this is the best solution for the system in the long run and would be a very strong selling point for future cameras. Maybe Olympus could eventually do both, so that existing MFT cameras benefit from
compatability of 4/3 lenses too. Now THAT would be the best solution!
I cannot see how Oly could implement Option 4 given the two mounts are different.
__________________
Dave
Welsh Photographic Federation Judge
Olympus UKPSG Member
Chairman Cwmbran Photographic Society
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 26th July 2013
Ian's Avatar
Ian Ian is offline
admin
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Hemel Hempstead UK
Posts: 7,709
Blog Entries: 13
Thanks: 144
Thanked 760 Times in 466 Posts
Likes: 93
Liked 123 Times in 61 Posts
Re: Four Thirds lens compatibility - what's your preference?

Quote:
Originally Posted by benvendetta View Post
I cannot see how Oly could implement Option 4 given the two mounts are different.
The key in the text is 'using adapters' - like the existing MMF series of adapters that allow Four Thirds lenses to be fitted to Micro Four Thirds camera bodies.

Ian
__________________
Founder/editor
Four Thirds User (http://fourthirds-user.com)
Digital Photography Now (http://dpnow.com)
Olympus UK E-System User Group (http://e-group.uk.net)
Olympus camera, lens, and accessory hire (http://e-group.uk.net/hire)
Twitter: www.twitter.com/ian_burley
Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/dpnow/
Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/ianburley/
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:48 AM.


The Write Technology Ltd, 2007-2015, All rights reservedAd Management plugin by RedTyger