Advertisements


Go Back   Four Thirds User discussion forum > Equipment > Lenses > Olympus lenses

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 25th March 2012
GFrankow's Avatar
GFrankow GFrankow is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Ohio
Posts: 13
Thanks: 10
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
50-200mm SWD Reported Focal Length

Hi everyone!

I just came across a little something that has me a little perplexed.

When I take a shot with my 50-200 SWD zoomed to 200mm (as it reads on the lens scale), the photo data (on the camera screen and in the ORF file when viewed in Olympus Master 2) says the focal length is only at 158mm. The other "index" marks (50, 70, 100, and 150) seem to give the right report.

(I just noticed this as I was taking some shots this week using the 50-200 with the EC-14 and it was only reporting 224mm max for the focal length.) This happens on both my E-3 and my E-500.

I also checked my 12-60 and 35-100 by themselves, and both seem to match the index marks on the lens. The 35-100 with the EC-14 reports 141.0mm -- close enough for my taste! Certainly seems to be a lens issue -- although everything else about the lens seems fine. (Although I am a little disappointed with the focus on the 35-100 -- I will probably post some images later and ask about that one in another thread.)

I checked the contacts and everything seems to be OK there -- no crud, scratches, or bending/denting.

I have had the lens and cameras for several years. I have taken a look back at a number of shots over the years, it looks like I sometimes get 158mm reported, and sometimes 200mm.

My firmware for the E-3 is version 1.4, the E-500 is version 1.2, and the version for the lens is 1.1. Olympus Master tells me that I am running the most recent versions of each.

Any help with this issue would be appreciated!!

Thanks everyone
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 25th March 2012
Bikie John Bikie John is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Wessex
Posts: 33
Thanks: 1
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 50-200mm SWD Reported Focal Length

My 50-200 SWD seems to report correctly. I usually use it with the EC-14 converter and at full stretch the EXIF reports it as 283mm, which is what it should be. I don't check very often, but I have never noticed any anomalies like yours.

I wouldn't worry about it too much as long as the photos are OK!

Ciao ... John
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bikie John For This Useful Post:
GFrankow (26th March 2012)
  #3  
Old 26th March 2012
GFrankow's Avatar
GFrankow GFrankow is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Ohio
Posts: 13
Thanks: 10
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 50-200mm SWD Reported Focal Length

John,

I was hoping someone would send me some reassurance. The images coming from the lens seem to be fine, so I will indeed take your advice and not worry.

Enjoy the day

Gary
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 27th March 2012
Ian's Avatar
Ian Ian is offline
admin
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Hemel Hempstead UK
Posts: 7,510
Blog Entries: 12
Thanks: 127
Thanked 681 Times in 420 Posts
Likes: 50
Liked 72 Times in 29 Posts
Re: 50-200mm SWD Reported Focal Length

Quote:
Originally Posted by GFrankow View Post
John,

I was hoping someone would send me some reassurance. The images coming from the lens seem to be fine, so I will indeed take your advice and not worry.

Enjoy the day

Gary
Hi Gary, this is an unusual fault. Is the lens still under warranty? It could potentially be problematical because the image stabilisation system needs to know the correct focal length.

Ian
__________________
Founder/editor
Four Thirds User (http://fourthirds-user.com)
Digital Photography Now (http://dpnow.com)
Olympus UK E-System User Group (http://e-group.uk.net)
Olympus camera, lens, and accessory hire (http://e-group.uk.net/hire)
Twitter: www.twitter.com/ian_burley
Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/dpnow/
Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/ianburley/
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ian For This Useful Post:
GFrankow (31st March 2012)
  #5  
Old 31st March 2012
GFrankow's Avatar
GFrankow GFrankow is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Ohio
Posts: 13
Thanks: 10
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 50-200mm SWD Reported Focal Length

Ian,

Thanks for the insight! I hadn't thought of that aspect -- although I hadn't seen anything that would have told me that the IS was not working appropriately.

Is there a place on the forums that I can post some images and ask for some technical analysis? (I thought the Critique forum was for more of a composition analysis than a technical analysis -- but I could certainly be mistaken!)

Gary
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 1st April 2012
Ian's Avatar
Ian Ian is offline
admin
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Hemel Hempstead UK
Posts: 7,510
Blog Entries: 12
Thanks: 127
Thanked 681 Times in 420 Posts
Likes: 50
Liked 72 Times in 29 Posts
Re: 50-200mm SWD Reported Focal Length

Quote:
Originally Posted by GFrankow View Post
Ian,

Thanks for the insight! I hadn't thought of that aspect -- although I hadn't seen anything that would have told me that the IS was not working appropriately.

Is there a place on the forums that I can post some images and ask for some technical analysis? (I thought the Critique forum was for more of a composition analysis than a technical analysis -- but I could certainly be mistaken!)

Gary
By all means post some shots here in this thread

Ian
__________________
Founder/editor
Four Thirds User (http://fourthirds-user.com)
Digital Photography Now (http://dpnow.com)
Olympus UK E-System User Group (http://e-group.uk.net)
Olympus camera, lens, and accessory hire (http://e-group.uk.net/hire)
Twitter: www.twitter.com/ian_burley
Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/dpnow/
Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/ianburley/
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ian For This Useful Post:
GFrankow (2nd April 2012)
  #7  
Old 2nd April 2012
GFrankow's Avatar
GFrankow GFrankow is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Ohio
Posts: 13
Thanks: 10
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 50-200mm SWD Reported Focal Length

Ian,

Thank you so much! Unfortunately, I have never had anyone with a photography background look at what I have shot -- and I need corneal transplants, so they all look pretty good to me. Now that I have found this issue, I am really wondering if I have more than just an issue with the lens -- possibly a focus issue with the E-3 as well.

Here is one of a shot of a local little bird that I shot about a week ago. The EXIF is reporting 224mm FL, but this was shot at 200mm with the 1.4X convertor. This was a handheld shot. I have also included a crop of the image.

Is there a way to post the original file (or at least a somewhat larger .JPG that would have the EXIF data included?)







Gary

Last edited by GFrankow; 2nd April 2012 at 01:20 AM. Reason: Needed to add more information to help analysis.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 2nd April 2012
mige0's Avatar
mige0 mige0 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Austria
Posts: 133
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 50-200mm SWD Reported Focal Length

Quote:
Originally Posted by GFrankow View Post
I checked the contacts and everything seems to be OK there -- no crud, scratches, or bending/denting.
Clean all contacts (camera, lens, converter) with isopropanol
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mige0 For This Useful Post:
GFrankow (4th April 2012)
  #9  
Old 2nd April 2012
Ian's Avatar
Ian Ian is offline
admin
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Hemel Hempstead UK
Posts: 7,510
Blog Entries: 12
Thanks: 127
Thanked 681 Times in 420 Posts
Likes: 50
Liked 72 Times in 29 Posts
Re: 50-200mm SWD Reported Focal Length

You can send me some files to my dropbox account here:

http://www.dropitto.me/IanBurley

I will send you the password by forum Private Mail.

Ian
__________________
Founder/editor
Four Thirds User (http://fourthirds-user.com)
Digital Photography Now (http://dpnow.com)
Olympus UK E-System User Group (http://e-group.uk.net)
Olympus camera, lens, and accessory hire (http://e-group.uk.net/hire)
Twitter: www.twitter.com/ian_burley
Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/dpnow/
Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/ianburley/
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 8th April 2012
GFrankow's Avatar
GFrankow GFrankow is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Ohio
Posts: 13
Thanks: 10
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Smile Re: 50-200mm SWD Reported Focal Length

Ian,

Happy Easter! I hope all is well with you.

I was wondering if you have had an opportunity to review the RAW files that I sent to your dropbox?

Please do not feel that I am "pushing" you -- I just wanted to make sure that I actually did send the files correctly.

Thanks again for any help you can offer!

Gary
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:25 AM.


The Write Technology Ltd, 2007-2012, All rights reservedAd Management plugin by RedTyger